Login
My Account
Home
Living Room
Stools
Sofa Sets
Book Shelves
Tv cabinets
Consoles
Coffee Tables
Dining room
Buffets
Dining Sets
Dining Chairs
Display Cabinets
Dining Tables
Dining Trolleys
Bedroom Sets
Wardrobes
Chest of Drawers
Beds
Office Furniture
Office Tables
Office Sofa
Office Chairs
Office Cabinets
Accessories
Decorations
Bathroom accessories
Grills & bbq
Self-care items
Home accessories
Pet accessories
Mirrors
Lighting Accessories
Electric items
Bedroom Accessories
Tools
Kitchen accessories
stationery
More
About us
Contact
Login
My Account
Home
Living Room
Stools
Sofa Sets
Book Shelves
Tv cabinets
Consoles
Coffee Tables
Dining room
Buffets
Dining Sets
Dining Chairs
Display Cabinets
Dining Tables
Dining Trolleys
Bedroom Sets
Wardrobes
Chest of Drawers
Beds
Office Furniture
Office Tables
Office Sofa
Office Chairs
Office Cabinets
Accessories
Decorations
Bathroom accessories
Grills & bbq
Self-care items
Home accessories
Pet accessories
Mirrors
Lighting Accessories
Electric items
Bedroom Accessories
Tools
Kitchen accessories
stationery
More
Contact
Your Cart
Your cart is empty
Start Shopping
Editing Contact Message
Fullname
Email
Phone number
Subject
Message
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety? [url=https://kra26c.cc]кракен ссылка[/url] Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers. The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out. https://kra26c.cc kraken тор The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane. So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all? In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third. Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate. But does that still hold true in 2024? According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale. “There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.” “If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney. Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
Show
|
Back